diff options
author | scuri <scuri> | 2008-10-17 06:10:15 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | scuri <scuri> | 2008-10-17 06:10:15 +0000 |
commit | 5a422aba704c375a307a902bafe658342e209906 (patch) | |
tree | 5005011e086bb863d8fb587ad3319bbec59b2447 /src/libjpeg/jfdctfst.c |
First commit - moving from LuaForge to SourceForge
Diffstat (limited to 'src/libjpeg/jfdctfst.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/libjpeg/jfdctfst.c | 224 |
1 files changed, 224 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/libjpeg/jfdctfst.c b/src/libjpeg/jfdctfst.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ccb378a --- /dev/null +++ b/src/libjpeg/jfdctfst.c @@ -0,0 +1,224 @@ +/* + * jfdctfst.c + * + * Copyright (C) 1994-1996, Thomas G. Lane. + * This file is part of the Independent JPEG Group's software. + * For conditions of distribution and use, see the accompanying README file. + * + * This file contains a fast, not so accurate integer implementation of the + * forward DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform). + * + * A 2-D DCT can be done by 1-D DCT on each row followed by 1-D DCT + * on each column. Direct algorithms are also available, but they are + * much more complex and seem not to be any faster when reduced to code. + * + * This implementation is based on Arai, Agui, and Nakajima's algorithm for + * scaled DCT. Their original paper (Trans. IEICE E-71(11):1095) is in + * Japanese, but the algorithm is described in the Pennebaker & Mitchell + * JPEG textbook (see REFERENCES section in file README). The following code + * is based directly on figure 4-8 in P&M. + * While an 8-point DCT cannot be done in less than 11 multiplies, it is + * possible to arrange the computation so that many of the multiplies are + * simple scalings of the final outputs. These multiplies can then be + * folded into the multiplications or divisions by the JPEG quantization + * table entries. The AA&N method leaves only 5 multiplies and 29 adds + * to be done in the DCT itself. + * The primary disadvantage of this method is that with fixed-point math, + * accuracy is lost due to imprecise representation of the scaled + * quantization values. The smaller the quantization table entry, the less + * precise the scaled value, so this implementation does worse with high- + * quality-setting files than with low-quality ones. + */ + +#define JPEG_INTERNALS +#include "jinclude.h" +#include "jpeglib.h" +#include "jdct.h" /* Private declarations for DCT subsystem */ + +#ifdef DCT_IFAST_SUPPORTED + + +/* + * This module is specialized to the case DCTSIZE = 8. + */ + +#if DCTSIZE != 8 + Sorry, this code only copes with 8x8 DCTs. /* deliberate syntax err */ +#endif + + +/* Scaling decisions are generally the same as in the LL&M algorithm; + * see jfdctint.c for more details. However, we choose to descale + * (right shift) multiplication products as soon as they are formed, + * rather than carrying additional fractional bits into subsequent additions. + * This compromises accuracy slightly, but it lets us save a few shifts. + * More importantly, 16-bit arithmetic is then adequate (for 8-bit samples) + * everywhere except in the multiplications proper; this saves a good deal + * of work on 16-bit-int machines. + * + * Again to save a few shifts, the intermediate results between pass 1 and + * pass 2 are not upscaled, but are represented only to integral precision. + * + * A final compromise is to represent the multiplicative constants to only + * 8 fractional bits, rather than 13. This saves some shifting work on some + * machines, and may also reduce the cost of multiplication (since there + * are fewer one-bits in the constants). + */ + +#define CONST_BITS 8 + + +/* Some C compilers fail to reduce "FIX(constant)" at compile time, thus + * causing a lot of useless floating-point operations at run time. + * To get around this we use the following pre-calculated constants. + * If you change CONST_BITS you may want to add appropriate values. + * (With a reasonable C compiler, you can just rely on the FIX() macro...) + */ + +#if CONST_BITS == 8 +#define FIX_0_382683433 ((INT32) 98) /* FIX(0.382683433) */ +#define FIX_0_541196100 ((INT32) 139) /* FIX(0.541196100) */ +#define FIX_0_707106781 ((INT32) 181) /* FIX(0.707106781) */ +#define FIX_1_306562965 ((INT32) 334) /* FIX(1.306562965) */ +#else +#define FIX_0_382683433 FIX(0.382683433) +#define FIX_0_541196100 FIX(0.541196100) +#define FIX_0_707106781 FIX(0.707106781) +#define FIX_1_306562965 FIX(1.306562965) +#endif + + +/* We can gain a little more speed, with a further compromise in accuracy, + * by omitting the addition in a descaling shift. This yields an incorrectly + * rounded result half the time... + */ + +#ifndef USE_ACCURATE_ROUNDING +#undef DESCALE +#define DESCALE(x,n) RIGHT_SHIFT(x, n) +#endif + + +/* Multiply a DCTELEM variable by an INT32 constant, and immediately + * descale to yield a DCTELEM result. + */ + +#define MULTIPLY(var,const) ((DCTELEM) DESCALE((var) * (const), CONST_BITS)) + + +/* + * Perform the forward DCT on one block of samples. + */ + +GLOBAL(void) +jpeg_fdct_ifast (DCTELEM * data) +{ + DCTELEM tmp0, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3, tmp4, tmp5, tmp6, tmp7; + DCTELEM tmp10, tmp11, tmp12, tmp13; + DCTELEM z1, z2, z3, z4, z5, z11, z13; + DCTELEM *dataptr; + int ctr; + SHIFT_TEMPS + + /* Pass 1: process rows. */ + + dataptr = data; + for (ctr = DCTSIZE-1; ctr >= 0; ctr--) { + tmp0 = dataptr[0] + dataptr[7]; + tmp7 = dataptr[0] - dataptr[7]; + tmp1 = dataptr[1] + dataptr[6]; + tmp6 = dataptr[1] - dataptr[6]; + tmp2 = dataptr[2] + dataptr[5]; + tmp5 = dataptr[2] - dataptr[5]; + tmp3 = dataptr[3] + dataptr[4]; + tmp4 = dataptr[3] - dataptr[4]; + + /* Even part */ + + tmp10 = tmp0 + tmp3; /* phase 2 */ + tmp13 = tmp0 - tmp3; + tmp11 = tmp1 + tmp2; + tmp12 = tmp1 - tmp2; + + dataptr[0] = tmp10 + tmp11; /* phase 3 */ + dataptr[4] = tmp10 - tmp11; + + z1 = MULTIPLY(tmp12 + tmp13, FIX_0_707106781); /* c4 */ + dataptr[2] = tmp13 + z1; /* phase 5 */ + dataptr[6] = tmp13 - z1; + + /* Odd part */ + + tmp10 = tmp4 + tmp5; /* phase 2 */ + tmp11 = tmp5 + tmp6; + tmp12 = tmp6 + tmp7; + + /* The rotator is modified from fig 4-8 to avoid extra negations. */ + z5 = MULTIPLY(tmp10 - tmp12, FIX_0_382683433); /* c6 */ + z2 = MULTIPLY(tmp10, FIX_0_541196100) + z5; /* c2-c6 */ + z4 = MULTIPLY(tmp12, FIX_1_306562965) + z5; /* c2+c6 */ + z3 = MULTIPLY(tmp11, FIX_0_707106781); /* c4 */ + + z11 = tmp7 + z3; /* phase 5 */ + z13 = tmp7 - z3; + + dataptr[5] = z13 + z2; /* phase 6 */ + dataptr[3] = z13 - z2; + dataptr[1] = z11 + z4; + dataptr[7] = z11 - z4; + + dataptr += DCTSIZE; /* advance pointer to next row */ + } + + /* Pass 2: process columns. */ + + dataptr = data; + for (ctr = DCTSIZE-1; ctr >= 0; ctr--) { + tmp0 = dataptr[DCTSIZE*0] + dataptr[DCTSIZE*7]; + tmp7 = dataptr[DCTSIZE*0] - dataptr[DCTSIZE*7]; + tmp1 = dataptr[DCTSIZE*1] + dataptr[DCTSIZE*6]; + tmp6 = dataptr[DCTSIZE*1] - dataptr[DCTSIZE*6]; + tmp2 = dataptr[DCTSIZE*2] + dataptr[DCTSIZE*5]; + tmp5 = dataptr[DCTSIZE*2] - dataptr[DCTSIZE*5]; + tmp3 = dataptr[DCTSIZE*3] + dataptr[DCTSIZE*4]; + tmp4 = dataptr[DCTSIZE*3] - dataptr[DCTSIZE*4]; + + /* Even part */ + + tmp10 = tmp0 + tmp3; /* phase 2 */ + tmp13 = tmp0 - tmp3; + tmp11 = tmp1 + tmp2; + tmp12 = tmp1 - tmp2; + + dataptr[DCTSIZE*0] = tmp10 + tmp11; /* phase 3 */ + dataptr[DCTSIZE*4] = tmp10 - tmp11; + + z1 = MULTIPLY(tmp12 + tmp13, FIX_0_707106781); /* c4 */ + dataptr[DCTSIZE*2] = tmp13 + z1; /* phase 5 */ + dataptr[DCTSIZE*6] = tmp13 - z1; + + /* Odd part */ + + tmp10 = tmp4 + tmp5; /* phase 2 */ + tmp11 = tmp5 + tmp6; + tmp12 = tmp6 + tmp7; + + /* The rotator is modified from fig 4-8 to avoid extra negations. */ + z5 = MULTIPLY(tmp10 - tmp12, FIX_0_382683433); /* c6 */ + z2 = MULTIPLY(tmp10, FIX_0_541196100) + z5; /* c2-c6 */ + z4 = MULTIPLY(tmp12, FIX_1_306562965) + z5; /* c2+c6 */ + z3 = MULTIPLY(tmp11, FIX_0_707106781); /* c4 */ + + z11 = tmp7 + z3; /* phase 5 */ + z13 = tmp7 - z3; + + dataptr[DCTSIZE*5] = z13 + z2; /* phase 6 */ + dataptr[DCTSIZE*3] = z13 - z2; + dataptr[DCTSIZE*1] = z11 + z4; + dataptr[DCTSIZE*7] = z11 - z4; + + dataptr++; /* advance pointer to next column */ + } +} + +#endif /* DCT_IFAST_SUPPORTED */ |