diff options
author | root <root> | 2011-04-14 23:02:32 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | root <root> | 2011-04-14 23:02:32 +0000 |
commit | e0ecd69eb8351fbfdc32e22cb9c2c6dc42cb3f4b (patch) | |
tree | 0d9f597d22a472a535d1c55e2e2e387f3c4dfb7a | |
parent | 643f2a6c50a99d6414797ba9a6313a02a6530994 (diff) |
*** empty log message ***
-rw-r--r-- | Changes | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | ev.pod | 8 |
2 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ Revision history for libev, a high-performance and full-featured event loop. TODO: ev_loop_prefork hint? TODO: ev_loop_wakeup TODO: confusion about threads ongiong +TODO: not_blocked flag. - change the default periodic reschedule function to hopefully be more exact and correct even in corner cases or in the far future. @@ -485,10 +485,10 @@ C<EV_WRITE> to C<POLLOUT | POLLERR | POLLHUP>. Use the linux-specific epoll(7) interface (for both pre- and post-2.6.9 kernels). -For few fds, this backend is a bit little slower than poll and select, -but it scales phenomenally better. While poll and select usually scale -like O(total_fds) where n is the total number of fds (or the highest fd), -epoll scales either O(1) or O(active_fds). +For few fds, this backend is a bit little slower than poll and select, but +it scales phenomenally better. While poll and select usually scale like +O(total_fds) where total_fds is the total number of fds (or the highest +fd), epoll scales either O(1) or O(active_fds). The epoll mechanism deserves honorable mention as the most misdesigned of the more advanced event mechanisms: mere annoyances include silently |