diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | ev.html | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | ev.pod | 23 |
2 files changed, 16 insertions, 13 deletions
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ <meta name="description" content="Pod documentation for libev" /> <meta name="inputfile" content="<standard input>" /> <meta name="outputfile" content="<standard output>" /> - <meta name="created" content="Mon Nov 12 09:11:00 2007" /> + <meta name="created" content="Mon Nov 12 09:11:56 2007" /> <meta name="generator" content="Pod::Xhtml 1.57" /> <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://res.tst.eu/pod.css"/></head> <body> @@ -73,7 +73,9 @@ watcher.</p> kqueue mechanisms for file descriptor events, relative timers, absolute timers with customised rescheduling, signal events, process status change events (related to SIGCHLD), and event watchers dealing with the event -loop mechanism itself (idle, prepare and check watchers).</p> +loop mechanism itself (idle, prepare and check watchers). It also is quite +fast (see a <b>http://libev.schmorp.de/bench.html</b> (<cite>benchmark</cite>) comparing it +to libevent).</p> </div> <h1 id="CONVENTIONS">CONVENTIONS</h1><p><a href="#TOP" class="toplink">Top</a></p> @@ -28,14 +28,14 @@ kqueue mechanisms for file descriptor events, relative timers, absolute timers with customised rescheduling, signal events, process status change events (related to SIGCHLD), and event watchers dealing with the event loop mechanism itself (idle, prepare and check watchers). It also is quite -fast (see a L<benchmark|http://libev.schmorp.de/bench.html> comparing it -to libevent). +fast (see this L<benchmark|http://libev.schmorp.de/bench.html> comparing +it to libevent for example). =head1 CONVENTIONS Libev is very configurable. In this manual the default configuration will be described, which supports multiple event loops. For more info -about various configuraiton options please have a look at the file +about various configuration options please have a look at the file F<README.embed> in the libev distribution. If libev was configured without support for multiple event loops, then all functions taking an initial argument of name C<loop> (which is always of type C<struct ev_loop *>) @@ -73,10 +73,10 @@ not a problem. =item ev_set_allocator (void *(*cb)(void *ptr, long size)) Sets the allocation function to use (the prototype is similar to the -realloc function). It is used to allocate and free memory (no surprises -here). If it returns zero when memory needs to be allocated, the library -might abort or take some potentially destructive action. The default is -your system realloc function. +realloc C function, the semantics are identical). It is used to allocate +and free memory (no surprises here). If it returns zero when memory +needs to be allocated, the library might abort or take some potentially +destructive action. The default is your system realloc function. You could override this function in high-availability programs to, say, free some memory if it cannot allocate memory, to use a special allocator, @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Set the callback function to call on a retryable syscall error (such as failed select, poll, epoll_wait). The message is a printable string indicating the system call or subsystem causing the problem. If this callback is set, then libev will expect it to remedy the sitution, no -matter what, when it returns. That is, libev will geenrally retry the +matter what, when it returns. That is, libev will generally retry the requested operation, or, if the condition doesn't go away, do bad stuff (such as abort). @@ -102,9 +102,10 @@ events, and dynamically created loops which do not. If you use threads, a common model is to run the default event loop in your main thread (or in a separate thrad) and for each thread you -create, you also create another event loop. Libev itself does no lockign -whatsoever, so if you mix calls to different event loops, make sure you -lock (this is usually a bad idea, though, even if done right). +create, you also create another event loop. Libev itself does no locking +whatsoever, so if you mix calls to the same event loop in different +threads, make sure you lock (this is usually a bad idea, though, even if +done correctly, because its hideous and inefficient). =over 4 |