diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'ev.pod')
| -rw-r--r-- | ev.pod | 51 |
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 8 deletions
@@ -308,15 +308,24 @@ environment variable. This is your standard select(2) backend. Not I<completely> standard, as libev tries to roll its own fd_set with no limits on the number of fds, but if that fails, expect a fairly low limit on the number of fds when -using this backend. It doesn't scale too well (O(highest_fd)), but its usually -the fastest backend for a low number of fds. +using this backend. It doesn't scale too well (O(highest_fd)), but its +usually the fastest backend for a low number of (low-numbered :) fds. + +To get good performance out of this backend you need a high amount of +parallelity (most of the file descriptors should be busy). If you are +writing a server, you should C<accept ()> in a loop to accept as many +connections as possible during one iteration. You might also want to have +a look at C<ev_set_io_collect_interval ()> to increase the amount of +readyness notifications you get per iteration. =item C<EVBACKEND_POLL> (value 2, poll backend, available everywhere except on windows) -And this is your standard poll(2) backend. It's more complicated than -select, but handles sparse fds better and has no artificial limit on the -number of fds you can use (except it will slow down considerably with a -lot of inactive fds). It scales similarly to select, i.e. O(total_fds). +And this is your standard poll(2) backend. It's more complicated +than select, but handles sparse fds better and has no artificial +limit on the number of fds you can use (except it will slow down +considerably with a lot of inactive fds). It scales similarly to select, +i.e. O(total_fds). See the entry for C<EVBACKEND_SELECT>, above, for +performance tips. =item C<EVBACKEND_EPOLL> (value 4, Linux) @@ -326,7 +335,7 @@ like O(total_fds) where n is the total number of fds (or the highest fd), epoll scales either O(1) or O(active_fds). The epoll design has a number of shortcomings, such as silently dropping events in some hard-to-detect cases and rewiring a syscall per fd change, no fork support and bad -support for dup: +support for dup. While stopping, setting and starting an I/O watcher in the same iteration will result in some caching, there is still a syscall per such incident @@ -338,6 +347,13 @@ Please note that epoll sometimes generates spurious notifications, so you need to use non-blocking I/O or other means to avoid blocking when no data (or space) is available. +Best performance from this backend is achieved by not unregistering all +watchers for a file descriptor until it has been closed, if possible, i.e. +keep at least one watcher active per fd at all times. + +While nominally embeddeble in other event loops, this feature is broken in +all kernel versions tested so far. + =item C<EVBACKEND_KQUEUE> (value 8, most BSD clones) Kqueue deserves special mention, as at the time of this writing, it @@ -359,9 +375,21 @@ cause an extra syscall as with C<EVBACKEND_EPOLL>, it still adds up to two event changes per incident, support for C<fork ()> is very bad and it drops fds silently in similarly hard-to-detect cases. +This backend usually performs well under most conditions. + +While nominally embeddable in other event loops, this doesn't work +everywhere, so you might need to test for this. And since it is broken +almost everywhere, you should only use it when you have a lot of sockets +(for which it usually works), by embedding it into another event loop +(e.g. C<EVBACKEND_SELECT> or C<EVBACKEND_POLL>) and using it only for +sockets. + =item C<EVBACKEND_DEVPOLL> (value 16, Solaris 8) -This is not implemented yet (and might never be). +This is not implemented yet (and might never be, unless you send me an +implementation). According to reports, C</dev/poll> only supports sockets +and is not embeddable, which would limit the usefulness of this backend +immensely. =item C<EVBACKEND_PORT> (value 32, Solaris 10) @@ -372,12 +400,19 @@ Please note that solaris event ports can deliver a lot of spurious notifications, so you need to use non-blocking I/O or other means to avoid blocking when no data (or space) is available. +While this backend scales well, it requires one system call per active +file descriptor per loop iteration. For small and medium numbers of file +descriptors a "slow" C<EVBACKEND_SELECT> or C<EVBACKEND_POLL> backend +might perform better. + =item C<EVBACKEND_ALL> Try all backends (even potentially broken ones that wouldn't be tried with C<EVFLAG_AUTO>). Since this is a mask, you can do stuff such as C<EVBACKEND_ALL & ~EVBACKEND_KQUEUE>. +It is definitely not recommended to use this flag. + =back If one or more of these are ored into the flags value, then only these |