The close operation is actually async too. Meaning that the destroy operation probably should become async...

2 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/src/BLua.cc b/src/BLua.cc
index e8c5ab6..73995c0 100644
--- a/src/BLua.cc
+++ b/src/BLua.cc
@@ -270,8 +270,7 @@ int Balau::LuaStatics::callwrap(lua_State * __L, lua_CFunction func) {
 int Balau::LuaStatics::collector(lua_State * __L) {
     Lua L(__L);
     LuaObjectBase * o = (LuaObjectBase *) L.touserdata();
-    o->destroy();
-    return 0;
+    return L.yield(Future<int>([o]() { o->destroy(); return 0; }));
 }
 
 int Balau::LuaStatics::destructor(lua_State * __L) {
@@ -279,12 +278,12 @@ int Balau::LuaStatics::destructor(lua_State * __L) {
     L.push("__obj");
     L.copy();
     L.gettable(-3, true);
-    collector(__L);
+    LuaObjectBase * o = (LuaObjectBase *) L.touserdata();
     L.pop();
     L.push();
     L.settable(-3, true);
     L.pop();
-    return 0;
+    return L.yield(Future<int>([o]() { o->destroy(); return 0; }));
 }
 
 void Balau::Lua::setCallWrap(lua_CallWrapper wrapper) {
diff --git a/src/LuaHandle.cc b/src/LuaHandle.cc
index 7607665..a1dd93d 100644
--- a/src/LuaHandle.cc
+++ b/src/LuaHandle.cc
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ int sLua_IOHandle::IOHandle_proceed(Balau::Lua & L, int n, Balau::IOHandle * obj
 
     switch (caller) {
     case IOHANDLE_CLOSE:
-        h->close();
+        return L.yield(Balau::Future<int>([h]() mutable { h->close(); return 0; }));
         break;
     }